As a result of studies begun five months ago, the Postal Service has made the decision to move mail processing operations from the Roanoke and Lynchburg Post Offices. Once the transfers are completed, the mail processing operations at these facilities will cease. There will be no change to the retail unit or business mail entry unit at any of these facilities at this time. …
The Nielsen Company recently predicted smartphones will overtake feature phones next year. Increasingly smartphones are becoming an integral part of the daily lives of consumers. Direct mail marketers are seeing the newest and most intriguing way to integrate mobile with the traditional power of direct mail through Quick Response (QR) codes. …
BMS Direct is committed to preserving our environment.Â OurÂ Going GreenÂ program reaches all aspects of our production, facilities and materials utilization. …
Capitol Hill staffer Ronald Stroman has been named as the new Deputy Postmaster General according to a press release issued by the USPS.
His appointment marks the first time since 1971 the U.S. Postal Service has filled the No. 2 position from outside. Stroman will bring more than 30 years of professional experience in government, legislative affairs and leadership. …
We recently posted that The Intelligent Mail barcode will be required by the USPS beginning in May 2011.Â On Jan 13, 2011 the Postmaster General made a surprise move to delay the mandatory deadline of May 2011 for implementation of the new Intelligent Mail Barcode.
The reason for the delay was justified in this statement, “Recognizing ongoing concerns about mailersâ€™ readiness for broader adoption of the Intelligent Mail barcode (IMbÂ®), the USPSÂ® has decided that automation discounts for mail with POSTNET barcodes will continue to be offered beyond May 2011.”
The USPS has eased the rules on simplified addressing effective Jan. 2, 2011. These changes are expected to help small businesses who have not used direct mail because of the cost. Simplified addressing enables business mailers to use mail delivery route information, instead of exact names and addresses, to reach target customer groups in specific geographic areas. …
Rejection of Postage Increase Will Help Businesses Stay Competitive and Save Jobs
Tony Conway, Executive Director, Alliance for Nonprofit Mailers
Affordable Mail Alliance Commends Postal Regulatory Commisson on Rejection of Postal Rate Hikes
Washington, DC â€“ The Affordable Mail Alliance â€“ an unprecedented coalition of more than 1,200 nonprofits, Fortune 500 companies, small businesses, major trade associations, consumer groups, and citizens representing the vast majority of the mail sent in the United States â€“ said today that the decision of the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) to reject the rate hikes proposed by the Postal Service is good for businesses, and will actually benefit the USPS in the long run.
The proposed rate hikes, which were to have taken effect next January, would have added $3 billion annually to the nationâ€™s postal bill even though the rate of inflation is close to zero. The PRC decision reaffirms that the Postal Service must limit rate increases to the rate of inflation, as the law requires.
â€œThe PRC today has helped countless businesses stay competitive and saved tens of thousands of jobs,â€ said Tony Conway, Affordable Mail Alliance spokesperson and Executive Director of the Alliance of Nonprofit Mailers. â€œThe Commissioners recognized that imposing an additional tax on Postal Service customers is not the way to address its financial troubles. Our members look forward to working with the Postal Service on the long-term restructuring needed to restore the Postal Service to competitiveness.â€
While todayâ€™s decision will help the Postal Service retain volume and revenue, there is still more work to do. Blue ribbon commissions and government auditors have reported for decades that the Postal Service needs to streamline its inefficiently large network of undersized and obsolete mail processing plants. And although contracts with several major employee groups are up for renegotiation, the unions have signaled that they will strongly resist any major concessions. Additionally, Congress should also take a hard look at the Postal Serviceâ€™s current obligations for prefunding its retiree health benefits program, a major cost burden. This prepayment schedule is another major contributor to the Postal Serviceâ€™s financial problems.
â€œThe Affordable Mail Alliance is truly an unprecedented effort with members across the country all of whom deserve thanks for uniting to address this important issue,â€ Conway said. â€œWe are also grateful for our support from Congress and particularly for the leadership of Sen. Susan Collins, the key author of the 2006 Postal legislation at issue here and a tireless advocate for the future of the Postal Service. We stand ready to move forward in addressing the other issues that are so important to the future of the Postal Service.â€
More on the Affordable Mail Alliance
The Affordable Mail Alliance is an unprecedented coalition of postal customers. The coalition includes charities, consumer groups, small business, national retailers, utilities, banks, insurance companies, Fortune 500 companies, and the customers who use the Post Office every day. The members represent many of the Postal Serviceâ€™s biggest customersâ€”and many of its smallestâ€”and use every major class of mail. For further information, please visit www.affordablemailalliance.org o contact Jessica McCreight at email@example.com or (202) 464â€6900
â€œâ€¦ consumers are spending 28% less online time using e-mail, according to the measurement company [Nielsen].â€ Alex Palmer DMNews
â€œâ€¦ Ben & Jerryâ€™s is abandoning its e-mail marketing initiativesâ€
In a recent blog by Howard Fenton, senior consultant at NAPL, the ice cream company is going â€œto focus exclusively on social media advertising.â€ Ben & Jerryâ€™s has apparently decided that there are better alternatives than email for building customer relationships. If true, the only use left for email marketing is as an acquisition tool.
But direct mail is more responsive, less expensive than email for acquisitions!
All the hype from email providers hides the fact that email is more or less a non-responsive medium. Their claims of being more responsive are based on comparing emailâ€™s click response with direct mailâ€™s purchase response. On the cost side, they promote the idiocy of comparing the cost of distributing emails to the cost of distributing an equal number of direct mail pieces.
Email responsiveness, as with nearly all on-line advertising, is measured in clicks. A click on-line is when a consumer clicks on a link, opening a new web page containing more information. According to www.listpriceindex.comâ€™s Top Email Offer Calculator, this happens 0.52% to 1.87% of the time for a Business to Business list. In comparison the traditional direct mail response rate is 1% to 3%. But the traditional direct mail response is a purchase response, or some other significant activity.
A click isnâ€™t a purchase; clicks simply display new web pages with more information. There is an identical consumer action in direct mailâ€¦ itâ€™s called opening an envelope! Opening an envelope, or other direct mail piece, also displays a new page with more information. In fact opening a direct mail piece and clicking on a link are identical in fulfilling a consumerâ€™s request for more information. Both deliver the requested information, email delivers it on a new screen page; direct mail delivers the information on a printed page.
Since on-line advertisers call the action of a consumer requesting more information a â€œclickâ€, itâ€™s also accurate to call opening a direct mail piece and instantly receiving more information a â€œclickâ€. By establishing a common consumer action associated with both mediums, itâ€™s possible to accurately compare common response rates and the costs associated with generating those responses.
The USPS has been conducting a survey called the Household Diary Study for over twenty years. A five year average (2004-2008) of the data shows that 82% of recipients of direct mail advertising read or scan this advertising. Reading or scanning the contents of a direct mail piece certainly qualifies as a click. Because of the Household Diary Study we know that direct mailâ€™s click rate is 82%.
Comparison of response rates: direct mail 82%, email 0.52% to 1.87%.
Of all the costs associated with an email campaign, the only number used to calculate the cost of generating a click is the list cost, which includes distribution. To make a comparable click cost calculation, only the costs associated with direct mailâ€™s in-mail cost should be used. In-mail costs are printing, manufacturing, list costs, list prep, fulfillment, mail prep, shipping and postage.
Email has a perceived functional advantage in its ability to deliver direct connections to the web. But by adding digital media such as an optical disc, thumb drive, web key, or simple QR code, direct mail is also able to provide direct links to the Internet. For a fair cost comparison with email, digitally linked direct mail must be used. The in-mail cost of a direct mail piece containing an optical disc can be as low as $1.00 per piece and will be used in the following cost comparisons.
To calculate the click cost of a mailing, the in-mail cost per piece is divided by the click rate. For disc based mail divide $1.00 by 82%, yielding a click cost of $1.22. For email divide the list rental cost by the click rate.
Listpriceindex.com has a chart tracking the cost of email lists. The current average cost for BtoB lists is $279/m; the average for consumer lists is $112. So to do the math divide the cost per email address by its click rate or $279/1,000/0.52% = $53.65 per click. An alternative option would be to let listpriceindex.comâ€™s handy dandy click cost calculator do the math for you.
Cost-per-click comparison: direct mail $1.22, email from $14.92 to $53.65.
A case study provided by a reputable list broker (summer 2010), had a BtoC company purchasing 30,219 email addresses. Of these 985 were â€œopenedâ€. The definition of an email â€œopenâ€ is that the graphics were downloaded by the consumer, making the email readable. The reason itâ€™s unreasonable to compare the cost of distributing an equal number of email messages with an equal number of direct mail pieces is that the direct mail industry does not (typically) send blank or unreadable pieces to consumers!
With email, a marketerâ€™s message is only delivered to those consumers that download the graphics. In this case study 29,234 marketing messages were left â€œblankâ€ or unreadable by consumers. Using listpriceindex.comâ€™s average list cost of $112/m for a BtoC list, the current cost for renting 30,219 email addresses would be $3,385.
With direct mailâ€™s functional advantage of delivering 100% readable messages, this marketer only needed to mail 985 printed pieces to equal the same number of readable messages delivered through email. An accurate one-to-one cost of distribution comparison for delivering 985 readable messages results in a disc based direct mail cost of $985 compared to an email cost of $3,385.
Cost to distribute 985 readable messages: direct mail $985, email $3,385!
This case study generated 74 clicks or a click through rate of 0.25%. An email list cost of $3,385 divided by 74 clicks yields a cost per click of $45.74 per click. A direct mail piece containing optical media would generate the same number of clicks by entering 91 pieces (82% click rate) in to the mail stream. The total cost of generating 74 clicks using direct mail would be $91.00!
Cost to generate 74 clicks: direct mail $91, email $3,385!
In comparing email to direct mail, the important numbers to compare are the number of responses (clicks) generated and the cost of each response. When using these metrics, email underperformsâ€¦badly. Maybe thatâ€™s why Ben & Jerryâ€™s is dumping email for the next hot thing. The fact is that when comparable responses and their costs are used, direct mail (with digital content) delivers greater functionality at a lower cost than on-line advertising.